"The Making of a Scientist".
Literal Comprehension:
Curiosity is most
influencing factor to be a scientist. Still all people can't be scientist
through they have curiosity. To be a scientist one must love to nature and have
romantic love affair with her (Nature). The writer got encouraging influences
from his science teachers, biology professor and from uncle and brother who
were much interested in poetry. Besides he got influenced form his
parents-especially from his mother who helped him a lot. For his experience
parents in child's mind must there to fill two aspects. First, the child is the
best one, Second, he is not good enough. The writer was interested in science
when he was eleven. He though nature a friend and playground. He took previous
scientists as real people.
Having keen interest in various
subjects he loved and studied Indian history, art Indus Valley Script and many
more. He assumed that Victorian science was good one because there was best progress
in science being free from financial problems. He also points out that modern
scientists lack fun because they are only research based with tools not the
problems oriented. Even then the writer's passion to be a scientist was growing
up with the interest in multiple subjects. He left no sector noticed. Nature is
not complex thing so it is not difficult to solve/find scientific problems. He
referred Darwin, Faraday Galileo like all scientists who walked along
adventurous road of science. He has great interest on Neurology because there
can have chances to answer common question and large influence secondly It asks
question. who we actually are? The writer becomes scientist not to become
famous like other but because of inmost desire and fun and influences from his
friends.
Interpretation: This essay might be trying to
highlight the ideas that we do progress and do a lot in any sector if we do
with fun and work freely. To be a scientist is not only an inborn quality
rather so many factors become responsible there. Again doing workshop, seminars
and working with equipment is not scientific work in real. We can't think it is
scientific development with high qualities tools. But dedication and multidimensional essay is needed.
Critical Thinking: This essay has successfully presented the ideas that how curiosity leads
to progress and how continuous dedication helps to get success in any fields.
The writer's interest and final stage of gaining is influencing. Still there
are some confusing ideas presented in this essay. How can only parents and
homely environment create a scientific mind? can only curiosity, truth and
dedication help someone to be a scientist? Can one be veteran or at home in
multiple sectors at a time? Like the writer everyone wants to become great
influencing to other people.
Assimilation: After
going through this text I got so many ideas. We can't be successful in any
mission unless we have deep interest and dedication to it. How the literary
persons or scientists make their personal world is given clearly. To be
specific in any subject becomes boring. Sometimes having knowledge about
multiple disciplines is very much interesting one. Anyway curiosity is the main
factor to do progress in any sector.