THE
ARAL SEA: AN ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS
The
pressure to make economic development and the short- sighted responses to this
pressure are the cause of a great damage. It will make economic development
impossible and the region unliveable. The recent history of the Aral Sea has
proved this fact. In the 1950s the sea covered 66,000 square kilometres. It had
an average depth of 16 meters. Its water was fresh. However, by 1990 the Aral
Sea became almost half and was divided into two separate lakes. Its water became
just one third of its 1950s volume. The sea's salt content has increased by
almost 300 percent. The basic cause of the damage to Aral Sea was the use of
irrigation to expand agriculture.
The reduced flow of water into the
Aral Sea has had disastrous environment and economic consequences for the sea
and its basin fish has died. Cotton plantation has become impossible. Birds and
mammals have halved. In addition, the salt carried by the storm has made the
surrounding land infertile. Short-sighted agricultural practices have increased
the levels of salts, pesticides, and other damaging chemicals in the
environment. Because of the chemical contamination of drinking water, there has
been an increase in human health problems. In 1990, a scientific conference decided
that the Aral Sea region was an ecological disaster area in need of urgent
action to prevent its complete destruction. The story of the Aral Sea is one
example of the global problem of desertification through human activities. In
addition, it has helped us to find out the cause of desertification and an
alternative model for economic development.
ECOLOGY,
OVERPOPULATION, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Up until
two hundred years ago, humans did not have a significant effect on the ecology
of planet earth because there were not more than one billion people. Because of
the massive increase in population in the last two centuries, damage to the
ecology from human activities is considerable and may become much worse.
Locally, people respond to the pressure of overpopulation in ways that destroy
the ecology of the areas they live in. They cultivate the hilly areas, where
soil erosion makes the land unproductive very soon. The disappearance of
tropical forest – a result of countries attempts at economic development – is
causing great damage to the natural resources and the ecology of those nations.
The destruction of the world's tropical forests will have negative consequences
for the entire globe.
Family-planning
programs, which have proved successful in some developing countries, could
contribute to the solution of the overpopulation problem. They could make
economic growth increase. The number of children currently in the worldÚs
population means that birth control cannot be the sole solution to the problem of
overpopulation. The worldÚs population is sure to increase. Social and economic
development is also an essential part of a solution to the environmental damage
caused by overpopulation. Economic development, which is the answer to the
problem of overpopulation, is also the cause of massive damage to the
environment. Europeans and North Americans today are asking the people of the
developing nations not to overexploit natural resources, which they have been
doing for centuries to develop themselves. In both developing and developed countries,
traditional economic development must be replaced by policies and practices
that are sustainable.
UNSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE MAYAN CIVILIZATION
The use of
pesticides and the fossil fuel are not the only causes of environmental damage
in the present time. Humans have been damaging the environment for much longer
than the last century. Clearing fields for agricultural use, which began ten
thousand years ago, had a very disruptive effect on the environment. But man
used water and fertilizing material to sustain agriculture. The settled
societies that agriculture made possible also placed considerable strain on the
environment. They cut down trees for fuel and farming land. Mesopotamia, the
Mediterranean basin, and the Central America rain forests were areas where the
ecology was disrupted by early human activities. Here the Mayan civilization
will be discussed in detail.
The Mayas
had built many cities with wonderful temples, palaces, and public buildings.
And the total Mayan population was 5 million. To grow the crops needed to
support their large population, the Mayas replaced the forest with a complex
artificial environment consisting of raised fields and terraces with a drainage
system. The Mayas' expanding system of agriculture collapsed when the ecology
of the region could no longer sustain it. There was soil erosion in the hills
and the lowland was flooded. As a result, the crops decreased. The loss of food
production caused increase fighting for the available resources Ù this
destroyed the Mayan civilization. Like many other cases, the expansion of the
Mayan civilization was unsustainable it ultimately destroyed the environment
that supported it.
BIOLOGICAL
DIVERSITY UNDER GETTING INTO THE TOPIC
Biologists
have described one million species of the earth. In addition, they have
estimated the number of the species from three million to thirty million. More
than half of the species have their home in tropical forests. However, tropical
forests rapidly being destroyed humans. Millions of hectares of tropical
forests in Brazil, Indonesia and Malaysia have been cut down or burnt. The
destruction of tropical forests is causing the rapid extinction of the natural
species that are native there. Out of 2 million species living in the tropical
rain forests, 4,000 to 6,000 species are being disappeared every year, and it
might reach up to 27,000 in the future. First, rain forests species are a
valuable resource because their genes may enable scientists to strengthen
domesticated species. Researchers are using genes from the wild American oil
palm to develop resistance to the disease called spear rot in
domesticated African oil palm. Second, the wild species of the tropical forests
are an underused, valuable source of wild plants that could be domesticated.
Next, the endangered species of the tropical rain forests could be a source of
important new medications. Vinblastine and vincristine are
extremely effective in the treatment of two forms of cancer.
Although
the rapid loss of tropical species cannot be stopped completely, it can be
slowed if we address all its causes. First, conservation is a necessary
component of a solution to the biodiversity crisis. By protecting the habitat
of this species, it shows their extinction. Next, to provide the information
needed for conservation and education, we need to speed up research into the
species of the tropical rain forests. Only then people will realize the value
of conservation. Finally, we need to reduce the economic pressures that force
people to destroy the rain forests.
MAIN
READING CLIMATE CHANGE: MANAGING THE GLOBAL GREENHOUSE
1.
INTRODUCTION
There has
been an intense debate among both scientists and politicians about global
warming and about the appropriate response to it. Some scientists say that the
global climate has been changing. But some others have said that there is no
strong evidence to support the claim. The article will try to help the public
understand the issue of global warming.
2. GLOBAL
WARMING: FACTS AND UNCERTAINTIES
All scientists agree that gases like carbon
dioxide, CFCs, and methane clearly produce a greenhouse effect because they
prevent heat released by the earth from escaping into space. There is
historical evidence linking increases in the earthÚs temperature to increased
carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere. Now the amount of these gases has
increased more than in the Ice Age. Any effects of greenhouse gases on climate
will be felt worldwide and by future generations. Scientists have shown that
the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has been increasing since 1800
because of the increase in carbon dioxide, methane gases, and more recently
CFCs.
Industrialization, not processes occurring in
nature, accounts for much of the increase in greenhouse gases over the last one
hundred years. The burning of coal, oil and gas to generate energy necessary
for industry and the use of the CFCs as cooling agents contributed to the
increase in greenhouse gases. In order to feed the growing population of the
world, more rice has to be produced and more cattle have to be raised. However,
this increase in cattle rearing and rice production are major factors in the
increase of methane in the atmosphere. Moreover, the burning of tropical
forests in developing countries is a major contributor of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere. Following this some scientists have established that the earth has
become warmer in the last one hundred years due to the rise of the sea level,
and the reduction of the ice in the North Polar region and of the nonpolar
inland glaciers. But some other scientists are not prepared to conclude that
the warming trend of the last one hundred years is due to increased greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere. They argue that every time the warming has not
increased when the greenhouse gas has concentrated. Predicting the size of
future temperature increases involves some uncertainty.
3.
POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
Despite
some political opposition, most scientists argue that the evidence justifies
our taking immediate steps to cut the emission of global gases. We have to
control global warming immediately. If temperature increases are between 2 and
6 degrees Celsius, the consequences for ecosystems will be extremely serious.
Higher temperatures will also probably have a destructive impact on agriculture
due to lack of enough water for irrigation. Higher temperatures will lead to a
rise in ocean level, which may endanger vast areas of densely populated,
low-lying land.
4.
RESPONDING TO THE THREAT
The
majority of environmental scientists believe that we should take immediate
measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions and avoid a future catastrophe. The
industrial nations should be the first to start programs to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions because they have been responsible to this tragedy. Governments
must develop energy conservation policies that will reduce the demand for
energy produced by burning fossil fuels. Newer and more efficient appliances
should be developed to save energy. To replace fossil fuels, governments must
also develop alternative, sustainable sources of energy, such as wind and
hydrogen.
Policies
to increase energy efficiency were successful in past. As a result, many
industrial countries made fuel efficient cars. We could reduce energy
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions substantially with technology that
exists today. However, a major disadvantage of programs designed to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions is their enormous costs. The good news is that
measures to stabilize atmospheric carbon dioxide at a safe level, though
expensive, will not significantly slow the expected increase in global income.
Actions by
the wealthier countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will not solve the
problem of global warming if we ignore emissions in developing nations. The
industrialized world must ease the burden of debt carried by the poorer
countries so that these nations can pursue ecologically responsible economic
development. But debt forgiveness could be offered to developing countries who
commit themselves to protecting the world ecology. Developing countries will
also require increased economic and technical assistance if they are to help
solve the problem of greenhouse gases.
5. RETHINKING
OUR PRIORITIES
The problem of global warming will not be
resolved without massive expenditures by the developed nations. To make
available the funds necessary to address the root causes of global warming, we
must radically change our ways of thinking and behaving. We must consider that
it is a global problem, not only the problem of a particular nation. People
seeking a change in environmental thinking might be encouraged by public
opinion polls showing changes in attitudes toward environmental issues. In a
few international agreements, governments have committed themselves to reducing
greenhouse gases. We have some reason for believing that a revolution in
environmental thinking is still possible.
VARIATION IN LANGUAGE
All
languages, including English, vary and sociolinguistic is the scientific study
of that variation. Linguistic variation can be found in peopleÚs pronunciation,
grammar and vocabulary. The first of the two main types of linguistic variation
is between-group variation. It is known as regional varieties, i.e. dialect,
and other group varieties. Regional dialects are probably the best-known type
of between-group linguistic variation. A speaker is identified by his or her
regional dialect. The English spoken by men is different from that spoken by
women, with men tending to use non-standard forms more often than women.
Variation
within the individual is the second main type of linguistic variation.
Linguistic variation within the individual is associated with changes in the
situation in which the individual finds himself or herself. Linguistic
variation within the individual is exemplified in the different ways an
individual might address others.
SOCIOLINGUISTIC RULES OF SPEAKING
According
to sociolinguists, just having good linguistic competence in a second language
is not enough for a second language learner. One has to have sociolinguistic
competence, too. The conversation between the American host and the Japanese
student offers an example of a situation in which people fail to communicate
effectively, although their speech is without linguistic errors. Scientists
conclude that there are rules for socially and culturally appropriate speech
because miscommunication occurs between people whose speech is correct
phonologically, grammatically and semantically. Empirical research has
demonstrated the existence of rules for socially appropriate speech and of
cultural differences in these rules.
Do
differences in sociolinguistic rules mean that second language learners need to
learn rules for appropriate speech in the new language? Because they are
unaware of differences in rules for polite behaviour, people may unjustifiably
form a negative opinion about a person from another culture. To avoid the
potentially serious consequences of intercultural miscommunication, second
language learners should be prepared to identify and use the sociolinguistic
rules of the new culture.
CHILD
LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: PHONOLOGY
Although
the pronunciation of very young children differs a great deal from that of
adults, it is easily understood by family members. It is imperfect. But it is
useful to investigate which quality of childrenÚs
imperfect speech enable adults to adjust to it and understand it. If we use the
science of articulatory phonetics to describe childrenÚs speech, we find that it differs from adult English in systematic
ways. There are clear patterns in the types of consonants, which the children
is capable and incapable of producing at the early stages. As children get
older, they learn to produce sound that they are incapable of saying at an
earlier stage in their development. It is clear that children develop their own
systematic version of English pronunciation for some
researchers, this is evidence that humans are innately programmed to learn
language.
LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: THE EARLY YEARS
1.
INTRODUCTION
ChidrenÚs
acquisition of their native language, first five years of life, is an
impressive achievement. They have learned perfect pronunciation, and continue
to learn vocabulary and some grammatical patterns and new styles of speaking.
The language acquisition process is completed successfully without the help of
formal teaching. The child has linguistic interaction with the caregivers and
his peers. Provided thay have access to the language spoken to their
environment, all children successfully learn that language, regardless of their
intellectual or socioeconomic differences. This article examines
psycholinguistic research into how children acquire their native language.
2. GOALS AND
METHODS
Developmental psycholinguistics seeks to
account for language acquisition by developing hypotheses from theories and
testing them empirically. Ensuring that the data are accurate and
representative is essential in child language acquisition research. Otherwise,
this research will not be valid. Because of the complexity of language and
human behaviour, research projects in developmental psycholinguistics usually
have a narrow focus on small aspects of language acquisition.
3. CHILDRENÚS ENGLISH AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF GRAMMAR
This article focuses on one component of
chidrenÚs early English, its grammar because
it will help us to know how he is making progress in phonology and vocabulary.
ChildrenÚs developing grammar is first visible
when they start producing two-word utterances. Their pronunciation is quite
imperfect. If we study the data of childÚs
language, we know that the language produced by children is creative. Next, the
utterances of very young children are simpler than those of adults because
children systematically omit function words. After this, the word-order
patterns found in childrenÚs English show that their language is
rule-governed. As childrenÚs utterances become longer, it becomes
clear that their grammar increases in complexity, in addition to reflecting the
rule-governed creativity of their language, childrenÚs errors of overgeneralization show that they construct their own
grammatical rules.
4. CAREGIVER
LANGUAGE
Child-directed speech (CDS) is generally
similar to speech used with adults, except during a short period when the child
is about two years of age. For a short time, caregivers change their speech in
a number of ways in order to make it easier for very young children to
understand. Caregivers almost always react to children's speech as a natural
attempt to communicate; they respond to its perceived meaning. Caregivers
normally do not correct errors in grammar or pronunciation in children's
English; when they do so, children are unable to use the correction.
5. THEORIES
OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
A theory of language acquisition must account
for the properties of child and caregiver language: Children do not imitate
consciously the adult's language. They are creative, but their language is
based on rules. And their mistakes are not corrected by caregivers. There are
two theories to explain the language acquisition.
The first one is the imitation-reinforcement
theory, or I-R theory. It argues that language is acquired through a process of
imitation and reinforcement. Imitation and reinforcement play some role in
language acquisition. By relying in imitation, the I-R theory explain data that
show children are not good imitators but excellent creators of language. The
imitation-reinforcement theory also cannot explain the rule-governed nature of
children's original utterances. Reinforcement cannot be a major component of
child language acquisition because caregivers rarely correct children's errors in grammar and
pronunciation. And even if they correct the errors, children are unable or
unwilling to correct their speech. The imitation-reinforcement (I-R) theory
cannot explain how children continue developing their grammar and pronunciation
without any correction from their caregivers.
There is another theory of language
acquisition. It is called the creative construction theory , or CC theory. It
argues that the ability to acquire language is innate in humans, and it can
explain two general aspects of the process left unexplained by the I-R theory.
These aspects are innateness and uniformity of children in language learning.
The creative construction theory argues that children themselves play a very
significant role in their acquisition of language, and they make very similar
rule to those of the adults. By arguing that children are innately equipped to
learn language, the creative construction theory is able to explain much that
the I-R theory cannot. Although it is more adequate than the
imitation-reinforcement unanswered. There still remains a great deal to be
understood about the process of language acquisition.