The method of medieval historians had a
defective method. They relied on the facts of tradition and they did not have
analyzing power. They conceived historical ages initiated by an historical
event. They speculated about future depending on the past events. The
historians of this period blindly believed that all activities of man were
under the control of God. The history neglected the primary duty of a man. They
exaggerated the work of providence in history to a point which left nothing for
man to do. So, medieval historiography was so weak in critical method as
Collingwood points.
The Medieval historiography had left
the tremendous effect on European Historical Thought. The history of the world
became a common place. A single chronological framework became all historical
events. The providential idea became so dominant during this age. The forward
and backward looking notion helped the Renaissance, the French Revolution and
so on. Finally, the division of history into periods with its strange features
had become a common practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment